From Zimbio.com Written by skins on Sep-30-07 2:13pm
Is it possible that there is already a medical cure for cancer and that the pharmaceutical companies and governments of the world are keeping it from us? I believe that it is quite possible.
Cancer is multi-billion dollar a year INDUSTRY for pharmaceutical companies and the purpose of an industry is to drive revenue. And why not? For the government, pharmaceutical companies contribute over $100,000,000 (that's one hundred million dollars) a year in campaign funds. If there was a cure, it is in everyone's best interests to keep the sick--sick, in order to continue driving revenue into the business that in turn funds government campaigns. Do you really think the Global Elitists really care about how many lives they are destroying? No, they don't. All they are interested in is control and if they can keep us sick, they are at the advantage. Cancer kills more Americans and Canadians per year than World War 2 did. They are not interested in sharing a cure with the world, they are just interested in TREATMENT.
The World Health Organization says that 80% of Cancer is environmentally caused yet instead of putting the money towards prevention, it goes towards treatment. In an article in the New York Times on 7/12/05, it states that a new wave of drugs were being released that could extend a persons life by a few months. The cost is $100,000/year per patient. Therefore, even just 100 patients equals $10,000,000 in revenue. That's a staggering amount of money that will go to government campaign funding and more Cancer treatment.
So as you can see, Cancer is a very lucrative business for everyone involved. The more treatments they can come up with, the more money they can generate by keeping you alive longer so you can pay for them, which in turn keeps government campaigns funded and generates more revenue for the Cancer industry to come up with more treatments. It's really a vicious circle and they prey on our emotions to keep us line, so we will not only pay for treatments, but also we will give generously to donation campaigns.
It's no surprise that there is a direct correlation between medical breakthroughs and campaign drives. I saw 2 young girls the other day at the subway on my way to work holding their little donation boxes, asking people to donate money to help find a cure. After a little digging I found that just a couple of months ago there were some articles published that had to deal with a new medical breakthrough in Cancer treatment. There's that word again, treatment. Those girls should not have been saying, "Help us find a cure," they should have been shouting, "Help us find a treatment, suckers."
And yes, we are suckers. We buy into the lie that there couldn't possibly be a cure for this disease. Even though the first recorded case of Cancer was in 1500b.c., in ancient Egypt. It was recorded on papyrus and documented 8 cases of tumors occurring on the breast. You mean to tell me that in 3500 years, scientists haven't been able to find a cure? What are we paying these people for?
I'm not trying to make light of the situation here, I just think it's a very good possibility, based on all the time the pharmaceutical companies and the governments spend in bed, that a cure for this disease has already been found and is hidden. I'm not looking for a conspiracy here, I'm just looking at the facts and the facts tell me that Cancer is big business and anyone that owns a business never wants it to fail or go bankrupt.
Would you?